Sowing The Seeds For Settlement

Many clients think that once they hire a divorce attorney, they are setting themselves up for protracted litigation.  In fact, most attorneys are skilled at negotiation and work hard to help clients settle their cases without ever stepping foot in a courtroom.  This is not a sign of weakness but rather a practical solution.  Litigation can be risky and expensive. Outcomes are not guaranteed. When clients settle a matter, they keep some modicum of control in a situation that is often out of control and highly emotional.

I recently wrote an article for the American Bar Association’s Family Advocate.  This article, Preparing A Client For Settlement discusses in detail how attorneys can assist clients in reaching a settlement of their divorce matter.

The process of settlement commences with the initial consultation.  It is during this time that the seeds of settlement are sown.  When assisting a client in understanding the divorce process, it is crucial that settlement is discussed as a viable outcome.  It is necessary to impart this information early in the process so that a client truly understands all the options.

Gathering the financial details so that the all aspects of the marital estate are known is crucial whether settling the case or proceeding to trial.  Without full and accurate disclosure and valuation of assets/debt, it is impossible to understand whether a settlement proposal is even viable.

Once the marital estate is fully understood, settlement discussions can ensue.  There are a number of ways in which this can happen — mediation, arbitration, four-way meetings, etc.  Each option has its positive and negative aspects.  The most important element is that the client fully understands and appreciates the choices available and is fully on board with any settlement decision that is made.

About The Author
Posted in Divorce

Thoughts On Being A Family Lawyer

Last April, I was honored to be asked by Avvo (the most popular legal question and answer forum and directory) to speak at their annual Lawyernomics conference in Las Vegas about building a brand and growing a network.  While at the conference, I also filmed a video discussing my own practice.  See video by clicking here.

This experience required me to think deeply about what it means to me to practice family law.  In the video, I tried to communicate my philosophy.  In my view, family law cases are among the most difficult because they deal with such personal issues.  Further, because a divorce, custody or support matter may be a party’s first experience dealing with the legal system, there is a huge responsibility in guiding them through the process and helping them achieve their goals in the most efficient manner.

Truth be told, as difficult as my cases can be, there is no area of law that I would rather be practicing.

About The Author
Posted in Uncategorized

Making The Holidays Happy For Kids During A Divorce

In a recent post on Avvo’s Naked Law Blog (click here to view), I discussed the effect of divorce on children and offered some tips on how to deal with custody in light of a separation and/or divorce.  Issues regarding custody become magnified during holiday time.  After all, children bring magic to the holidays.  And both parents want to share the holidays with their children.  Also, holiday time is a time when we visit extended family and engage in longstanding family traditions.

As a result of these factors, unfortunately, holiday time often becomes a time when parties battle over the custody of their children.  Holidays become a time when parties can use the children to exert power over each other or attempt to avenge a wrong.  I have spent many holidays fielding phone calls from distraught clients whose holiday plans were ruined because the other party refused to cooperate with a predetermined or even Court Ordered custody schedule.

Clearly, no one wins when the children are used as pawns during the holidays.  However, there can be so much animosity and hurt feelings between parents who were previously married or in an intimate relationship that they lose sight of what is best for their children.

Children need both parents and both parents need to spend quality time with their children.  While it is difficult to share holiday time, with some cooperation and communication, this can be done successfully.  It is true that some holiday traditions may need to be reworked (or delayed) to accomplish this, but kids are very resilient and are often are happy to enjoy numerous celebrations.  It is also important for the children’s well-being to spend time with extended family, especially if that has been part of their upbringing.  Denying children time with aunts, uncles and grandparents is simply not productive.  However, it is also not productive if the extended family use their time with the children to simply bad mouth the other parent no matter how angry they may feel toward that party.

To make the holidays happy for everyone, parents are advised to make the children their priority and try to set aside their bad feelings toward each other.  If they think about the holidays from the perspective of the kids (rather than themselves) they are apt to make smart decisions about custody.  To the extent that parties can agree on a custody schedule that works for their family and not rely on a Judge to make a random decision, they are more likely to be satisfied with the outcome.  If parties are not able to communicate directly with one another to accomplish a workable schedule, they can use their attorneys and/or a neutral third party to guide them in the right direction.  To the extent that each party spends holiday time with their children they are wise to have a discussion with extended family before the celebration to advise them that bad mouthing the other parent in front of the children will simply not be tolerated.

The holidays come and go in a matter of weeks.  However, in the eyes of a child, the holidays are monumental.  Each year is important and each year should be memorable in a positive way.  It is up to the parents to make the holidays special for their kids, and this can be accomplished despite parental discord.  To summarize, set your differences aside, plan early,  keep family traditions and celebrations in mind and allow the children to enjoy time with both parents and extended family.  If these tips are followed, the holidays can be happy.

 

 

About The Author
Posted in Custody

Social Media Pitfalls In Divorce

shutterstock_134112389These days social media is ubiquitous.  Everyone, young and old, enjoys some form of social media — from Facebook to Twitter to Instagram– we are all spending significant time posting our life happenings, likes and dislikes, comments and thoughts.  But when there is a divorce, all these well-meaning posts can turn ugly and be used as fuel for the fire.

Courts now are more apt to consider social media posts in custody, divorce and support matters.  People post pictures of their children doing dangerous activities which can be used by the other side to challenge parental fitness.  In a support case, a party who claims that they are not able to work can be “caught” in a post running a marathon or skydiving or undertaking other adventures.  People connect to former love interests through social media which connections can lead to real-life meetings and then sometimes, to divorce.

While many people naively believe that their social media posts are private, this is a misconception.  As part of routine discovery, it is a common practice to ask a party to a divorce to provide documentation related to their social media activity.  And while attorneys and their staff are prohibited from concealing their identity to “friend” a party to a lawsuit with the purpose of obtaining information, posts on one’s social media page are often seen by friends and relatives of the opposing party and/or the opposing party directly, making this information easy fodder for a court battle.  Moreover, once a person realizes that his or her posts were inappropriate and not something they would want a Judge to see, they cannot simply remove them as that may be construed as spoliation of evidence.  Thus, the best idea is not to create these posts in the first place.  Simply stated, if you would not show a photo or share a comment with your soon to be ex and/or the parent of your child, you should probably not be posting it on social media.

Like any other habit that it is difficult to break, going “cold turkey” on social media can similarly prove challenging.  Nonetheless, for those who find themselves battling in a family matter, it may be the best course of action, at least until the case can be resolved.  And if there are posts that in hindsight were made in poor judgment, the good news is that Judges are oftentimes very forgiving and will give parties a second chance especially if there is an acknowledgement of wrongdoing and a movement forward in the right direction.

Whether you are involved in family law litigation or not, the old adage, “think before you speak,” should be adapted to “think before you post.”  While this practice cuts down on some of the spontaneity of social media, considering what you say or do before it is done, is always a wise move.

 

About The Author
Posted in Divorce

Thinking About Pet Custody

My recent post on Avvo’s Naked Law Blog contains some thoughts about pet custody.  Click here to see the post.

About The Author
Posted in Uncategorized

New Jersey Enacts Changes To Alimony Laws

shutterstock_211252402Parties in New Jersey who pay are about to pay alimony, or already pay alimony, should understand some recent changes to the statute that may impact their obligations.  Some of the most critical changes are detailed below.

First, it appears that there is a movement away from “permanent alimony.”  In fact, the word “permanent” was removed from the statute in its entirety and replaced with the phrase,  “open durational alimony.”  More importantly, the revised statute provides that for marriages less than 20 years in duration, the alimony term cannot exceed the length of the marriage.  While this is subject to deviation under certain circumstances, it is a far cry from the situation in the not so distant past where there could be a permanent alimony award for a marriage lasting as little as ten years.

Another important change is that there is now a rebuttable presumption that alimony terminates upon “full retirement.”  The definition of full retirement under the statute is the age at which is a person is entitled to receive full retirement benefits under the Social Security Act.  If an obligor wants to retire, and thus modify or terminate his/her alimony obligations prior to full retirement age, he/she has the burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the early retirement is reasonable and in good faith.

Further, a Court will now look at ten factors in determining whether a non-self-employed party who loses his/her job should be entitled to a reduction/termination of an alimony obligation.  A Court will not even consider an application to modify until a party has been unemployed or not able to return to employment at prior income levels for at least 90 days.  If an obligor is self-employed, the application for a reduction/termination of alimony for loss of income must analyze the economic and non-economic benefits he/she receives from the business now compared to those benefits which existed at the time the alimony obligation went into effect.

The statute also sets forth some guidelines on what constitutes cohabitation.  This was a gray area, previously.  It also provides that alimony can be suspended or terminated if a party is cohabiting.

The foregoing highlights only some of the important changes in the Statute.  There are others certainly worth reviewing as they will all impact a divorcing party’s future financial obligations.

About The Author
Posted in Support

The N.F.L. Realizes That Domestic Violence Is Not A Game

shutterstock_214482898Yesterday, the N.F.L. terminated Baltimore Ravens running back, Ray Rice . See story here.  This is after video emerged of Rice punching his fiancee (now wife) and knocking her unconscious in an elevator in Atlantic City.  Previously, Rice was suspended for merely two games when an earlier video showed Rice dragging his unconscious fiancee from the elevator without showing the punch that led to her being knocked out.

Many are applauding the N.F.L. for taking the issue of domestic violence seriously and demonstrating that they will not tolerate it.  Domestic violence is a serious issue and one that does not merely involve professional athletes.  In fact, many couples are affected by it every day.

While State laws vary, generally they are designed to protect victims of abuse.  And abuse under these statutes often does not have to be physical.  In many States, threatening and harassing behavior is enough for a party to obtain an Order of Protection, sometimes also referred to as a Restraining Order.  Primarily, an aggrieved party has to prove that they were put in imminent danger of serious bodily harm.  Of course if there is physical violence, criminal charges can also be leveled against the aggressor.

The laws addressing domestic violence are not merely intended to protect spouses.  Oftentimes, the laws will apply to children, unmarried couples, even siblings.  Usually, the laws do not apply to parties that are unrelated or not in a intimate relationship.  For example, if two friends get into a physical altercation and one hits the other, the injured party will not normally be able to file for a Restraining Order against the other under the Domestic Violence statutes but may be able to press criminal charges.

If someone is the victim of domestic violence, the first step in obtaining a Restraining Order is to contact the local police.  They can assist the victim in making out the domestic violence Complaint.  A Court can then enter an ex parte temporary Order against the aggressor.  Usually, this requires the aggressor to surrender any firearms that he or she has to the police and requires the aggressor to leave any residence shared with the victim.  The Order also usually prevents all contact between the aggressor and the victim, and may even make provisions for temporary custody arrangements for minor children who are not covered by the Order.

Shortly after the temporary Order is issued, a final hearing is usually held to determine if the temporary Order should be made a final Order.  At that time, both the aggressor and the victim can litigate their case and if there is sufficient evidence, the Court will issue the final Restraining Order.  This Order will remain in place for a period of time.  Serious penalties, including criminal penalties, can result from a violation of a Restraining Order.  Moreover, the victim can apply to keep the Order in place if there is ongoing violence at the time that the Order is set to expire.

With sufficient evidence, Courts are often inclined to enter Restraining Orders.  The most difficult aspect of getting the Restraining Order is convincing the victim that there is truly domestic violence in the household and that the Courts will protect them.  Many victims, unfortunately, feel that they are somehow responsible for the violence and become accustomed to the abuse such that they are rendered helpless.  Oftentimes, it takes friends and family members to convince the victim to seek the necessary help.  However, with greater recognition of the problem and a zero tolerance policy by employers (including the N.F. L.) for domestic violence, it is likely that more people will seek help  and protection for this serious, and potentially deadly, problem.

About The Author
Posted in Uncategorized

Opting To Learn About Stock Options In A Divorce

shutterstock_171091076Many businesses choose to reward their employees with stock options in lieu of other forms of compensation.  Frequently, these options are not vested when awarded, but rather vest over time.  Even when options do vest, they are not automatically exercisable.  Even when they are able to be exercised, they might not have any value.

Are these options includable as assets to be divided in a divorce?  This depends on a number of circumstances.  First, one must consider why the options are being awarded.  Most frequently, they are awarded for past service, sometimes in conjunction with or in lieu of a bonus.  Sometimes, however, they are awarded as an incentive for future work.  If that is the case, then a party in a divorce may want to try and argue that they should not be included in the marital estate.  The stock option plan is the starting place for determining the reason for the award.

Most Courts include those options that have been awarded as assets subject to division in a divorce even if those options are not yet vested.  Typically, these options cannot be distributed until they are vested and can be exercised.  A party not holding these options can attempt to place a value on them but that is difficult if not impossible to do.  As such, Courts usually engage in a deferred distribution method in awarding these assets.  Thus, if and when the options do become vested and are exercised for value, the non-owner spouse will then get their share of same.

Options can have significant value and should not be overlooked in a divorce.  Opting to understand these assets in the only real “option” that should be considered.

About The Author
Posted in Divorce

Can Grandma and Grandpa Get Custody In Pennsylvania?

shutterstock_208005667We constantly receive calls from grandparents inquiring about their custody rights.  In some instances, the grandparent has been the child’s primary caretaker from birth.  In other instances, the grandparent has had regular contact with the grandchild and now is excluded from the child’s life due to a divorce.  No matter what the situation, many grandparents want to assert their rights and need to understand legally how they do so.

In 2011 a new Child Custody Act (set forth at 23 Pa. C.S.A. § 5321) went into effect in Pennsylvania which clarified the circumstances under which a grandparent may file for custody of a grandchild, as well as the criteria that would be used by the Court to determine if the grandparent’s petition for custody should be granted.

In order for any person in Pennsylvania to request custody of a child, that person must first have “standing” to file a petition.  For a grandparent seeking legal custody of a child or sole/primary physical custody of a child, grandparents must either be “in loco parentis” (in the place of a parent) to the child or must 1) have a relationship with the child that began either with consent of a parent or under a court order, 2) assumed or is willing to assume responsibility for the child, or 3) meets one of the following conditions: the child has been determined to be a dependent, the child is substantially at risk due to parental abuse, neglect, drug or alcohol abuse, or incapacity, or the child has resided with the grandparent for at least twelve (12) consecutive months and has been removed from the home by the parents, so long as the action is filed within six (6) months of the child being removed from the grandparent’s home.  If a grandparent meets one of these criteria, he/she may file for legal custody or sole/primary custody of a grandchild.

If a grandparent is only seeking partial physical custody or supervised physical custody of a grandchild, the grandparent has standing to file a petition if 1) the parent of the child is deceased, 2) the parents are separated for at least six (6) months or have commenced and continued a proceeding to dissolve the marriage, or the child has resided for twelve (12) consecutive months with the grandparent and is removed from the home by the parents, so long as the action is filed within six (6) months of the child being removed from the grandparent’s home.  The second provision marks a change from the prior law in Pennsylvania, which had previously only allowed grandparents to seek custody if the parents were pursuing a divorce.  The new law broadens this provision to include parents who have been separated for at least six months, even if a complaint in divorce has not been filed.

Once a grandparent has established standing to file for custody, the Court will then consider whether or not the grandparent should be awarded custody of the child.  For those grandparents seeking primary/sole physical custody or legal custody, the Court will evaluate their request in the same manner that the Court evaluates a parent’s request for custody.  Specifically, the Court will look to the best interest of the child, which is determined by the sixteen custody factors set forth in 23 Pa. C.S.A. § 5328(a).

For grandparents that are only seeking partial physical custody or supervised physical custody, the Court must take into account the rights of the child’s parents (or other party) who has primary custody of the child.  Specifically, the statute provides that the Court must consider whether the award of custody would interfere with any parent-child relationship in addition to whether it would be in the best interest of the child.  In cases where the grandparent has standing because the parents have been separated for six months or because a parent is deceased, the statute requires that the Court additionally look to the amount of personal contact between the child and the grandparent prior to the filing of the action.

Under Pennsylvania’s statute, great-grandparents may also seek partial physical custody or supervised physical custody under the same statute as grandparents.  While the Pennsylvania statute does not specifically permit great-grandparents standing to seek primary/sole physical custody, if the great-grandparent stands “in loco parentis” to the children, the great-grandparent may still seek primary/sole physical custody under that provision.

Regardless of how the party seeking custody establishes his/her standing to file for custody, it is the best interest of the child that remains paramount in the Court’s decision in a custody matter involving parents, grandparents, or great-grandparents

About The Authors
Posted in Custody

Who’s Your Daddy? – Figuring Out The Law On Parentage and Parental Obligations

Being a parent is difficult without a doubt.  Becoming a parent is usually is not too difficult, but when you involve the legalities of assisted reproduction technology, it can become complicated.  Such was the recent case of the actor Jason Patric.  I discussed his situation and the results of his case as well as how this situation would be viewed in Pennsylvania in a recent article for The Legal Intelligencer.  Please see it attached here, and let me know your thoughts.

About The Author
Posted in Custody
About Family Law Focus
The Family Law Focus blog provides highlights, updates and insights on complex family disputes including divorce, division of property, and alimony; child and spousal support; child custody; domestic violence; pre- and post-nuptial agreements; name changes; and adoption or termination of parental rights.
Subscribe For Updates

familylawfocusblog

The Editor

Attorney Jennifer A. Brandt, chair of Cozen O'Connor's Family Law practice, has represented a wide variety of clients in hundreds of family law cases in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Jennifer is a regular legal commentator on national and local television outlets such as CNN, Fox New Network, HLN, MSNBC, Fox29, ABC News, NBC and CBS and frequently writes and contributes to articles in numerous publications, including the Huffington Post, Fox Business.com, The PhiIly Post, Avvo.com, Allparenting.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Philadelphia Business Journal, the National Law Journal, and Main Line Today magazine.
Cozen O’Connor Blogs